Can you let it go? The eight questions
A three-minute exercise for Friday evenings and the night before a hearing. Then the Scale, the Balloon and one move with a date.
When you need this
There is something in your chest. Not metaphorically. Pressure, weight, a tightening that switches on when you read a letter, hear a name, or watch your child leave on a Sunday evening. It has no diagnosis and no name. But it is there.
The book’s question is not why you carry it. The question is why you hold it. And the answer is counter-intuitive: people do not hold pain because they are weak. They hold it because they believe the pain is them. That if they let it go they will lose something of themselves: the last link to what the marriage was, the proof that they loved, the only way left to feel anything.
The pain you carry is not you. The pain is an object. And like any object, it can be moved.
Letting go of the feeling is not letting go of the boundary
This is the one sentence in the chapter that the book asks you to memorise. Releasing the feeling does not mean releasing the boundary. Letting go of the pain does not mean agreeing to an injustice. Letting go of the tightness in your chest does not mean telling anyone: you are right, I am not a good parent. It means the opposite.
A boundary without a charge is stronger than a boundary with one. A letter written in anger gives the other side material. A letter written after release has nothing to catch on. Walk into a hearing with a clenched chest and the room sees a parent in conflict. Walk in after release and it sees a calm person with documentation. The documentation stays. The protocols stay. Only the load leaves.
The eight questions
The technique does one thing. It helps you locate what you are carrying, turn it into an object outside yourself, and let it go. No preparation is needed. You need three minutes, and a pencil if you like one. The book puts the division of labour in one line: the vessel is mine, the contents are yours.
The walk-through below shows one question at a time. The text boxes are there only so that you can see your own words. What you type is never stored and never sent. It exists in this page and is gone when you close it.
Pause for a moment. What is happening right now?
What you type is never stored and never sent. It exists only in this open page. This is a self-regulation exercise, not therapy. If you are in crisis, contact your local emergency services or a crisis line.
Why it is built this way
- The blank line exists because your word becomes the reference for everything that follows. You located it; you named it. Anyone else’s word would be contamination.
- The boat is externalisation. The moment you put what you found into something that is not you, pain stops being an identity and becomes an object. A thing in a boat. A thing you steer.
- Bigger, smaller, turn: the three commands are proof of control. As soon as the boat moves at your command, what is inside it is no longer the master.
- “Can you” and “do you want to” are separate questions: ability and will. Some can and will not. Some want to and cannot. “No” interrupts nothing. It means: not yet. The boat waits.
- The last two questions are the point. The person who feared being left empty is surprised, because something comes. What comes is not broken.
The charge points
The charge does not switch on at random. It has predictable points, and when you know them you can have the boat ready in advance.
- Friday evening, when the child leaves. The house empties. What was bearable all week because you were busy suddenly appears. A silence that is too loud.
- The night before a hearing. The body prepares for a fight. You lie in the dark trying to sleep while an old alarm sends signals you did not ask for.
- After an email. One sentence aimed exactly where it hurts. The reflex says: answer now. And now is always the wrong time to answer.
At each of these: stop, locate, put it in the boat. Three minutes. Less time than you would spend on the email you would regret tomorrow.
The Scale, the Balloon, the Move
The Scale: two numbers
A procedure without a number is a ritual; with a number it is an instrument. First, rate the intensity of what was released, from 0 to 10. Then allow the opposite: a feeling of love, from a memory where it was real, or from imagination where it is not yet. Hold it for thirty seconds and rate what was received, 0 to 10. Look at the gap. The aim is not zero on the first number; the aim is two numbers that sit close together. An emptied but unfilled person is safe, but not alive. If the gap is larger than four, go back to the weaker side for one more round. From then on the Scale is a daily instrument: two numbers in the morning, two in the evening when you need them.
The Balloon: for what you want
One more thing can be a load even though it shines: desire. A better life, a new love, a child who comes back. Gripped tightly, that tightens too, because a goal that is “the only way out” becomes a prison of its own. For the load there was a boat, downstream. For desire there is a balloon, upwards. Name what you want, clearly, once. Tie it to the balloon. Hand it over: to something higher if you believe, to the sky if you do not. A seed is sown, and the soil is not dug up every day to check.
The Move: one step with a date
One concrete next step, with a date. Not ten. One. The letter that is waiting, the call you keep postponing, the training you are about to start.
Release without a move is a spa programme.
What this is not
- It is a self-regulation exercise. It is not therapy, not treatment and not a cure, and it promises none. The book is blunt about this: any system that promises a cure is lying.
- If you are in crisis, if you are thinking of harming yourself or someone else, stop here and contact your local emergency services or a crisis line now. A three-minute exercise is not the tool for that moment.
- It is not surrender. You let go of the feeling, not of the boundary, the documentation or your child.
- It is not forgiveness on demand, and it is not a statement about the other parent. The second round of the boat carries your charge towards them, not them as a person.
- It is not an obligation. “No” is a legitimate answer. Nobody tells you what to put in the boat or when to let it go.
Beneath the Divorce, ch. 12 (“Can you let it go?”)
The eight questions, the charge points, the Scale, the Balloon and the Move all come from this chapter. The questions appear here in the book’s order and wording.
“Beneath the Divorce” is the working title of a book by Miroslav Ćurčić. It is still being written. The chapter this tool comes from is finished; the book is not.
About the book →Questions people ask
How do I let go of anger toward my ex?
The book offers an eight-question exercise: notice what is happening, locate the sensation in your body, place it in an imagined boat, prove you can steer the boat, ask whether you can and whether you want to let it go, and then notice what comes afterwards. It releases the feeling, not the boundary: documentation and limits stay in place.
Does letting go mean giving up on my child or my case?
No. The book’s central sentence in this chapter is that letting go of the feeling is not letting go of the boundary. A boundary without an emotional charge is stronger, because a letter written after release has nothing to catch on.
What if I cannot or do not want to let go?
Then the answer is no, and that is legitimate. “Can you” and “do you want to” are separate questions, and neither “no” interrupts anything. It means not yet. The boat waits.
Is this therapy?
No. It is a short self-regulation exercise from a book, not therapy or treatment, and it does not replace professional help. If you are in crisis, contact your local emergency services or a crisis line.
Is what I type saved?
No. The text boxes keep your words only inside the open page. Nothing is stored in your browser, nothing is sent anywhere, and everything disappears when you close or reload the page.
Related tools
Do you recognise this?
The tools are the practical half of the book. The other half is recognition: moments that parents in a long dispute describe in almost the same sentences. Read them and see which are yours. A pattern you can see loses some of its power.
Do you recognise this? →